Who should read this
Operators, senior lenders, community investors, and deal readers who need to know who controls money, decisions, reports, defaults, and mission protections before a venture launches.
Governance
This page is the working governance structure behind a Hadto venture. It is for operators, lenders, community investors, and deal readers who need to know who gets paid first, who runs daily decisions, what changes after a trigger, how this differs from a policy memo or template, and which documents should come out of the structure.
Operators, senior lenders, community investors, and deal readers who need to know who controls money, decisions, reports, defaults, and mission protections before a venture launches.
Governance prevents role confusion. It keeps operator authority, lender remedies, community rights, reporting duties, and mission locks from being explained differently after money has moved.
Whether the structure is clear enough to keep drafting, which missing rule should be written next, and which ambiguity should stop a deal conversation.
A policy memo can describe intent. Hadto governance has to name the capital stack, approval rights, default triggers, reserved matters, reporting duties, and mission lock that carry the intent under pressure.
A template can supply clauses. This structure starts with the business roles and cash priority so the documents match who runs the company, who gets paid first, and who can act after a breach.
A dashboard can display activity. Governance decides which reports matter, who receives them, which events require notice, and what authority changes when a trigger is reached.
A reader should be able to trace authority from ordinary operation to stress without asking for a separate explanation.
These terms keep one meaning across the site. Use the glossary before reading the role, service, blog, or governance pages.
Hadto's structure for making operator authority, capital priority, handoff rules, reporting duties, and downside triggers explicit before launch.
The accountable person who runs ordinary service-business decisions and carries responsibility for pricing, quality, staffing, customer response, and cash discipline.
A specific Hadto-backed service business or operating company with its own demand, documents, capital stack, operator, and reporting duties.
The documented decision rights, reserved matters, reporting duties, trigger rights, mission protections, and conflict rules that keep control legible.
The teachable method beneath a business: workflows, source-of-truth rules, evidence trails, review gates, and operating cadences that make work inspectable.
A reader should be able to scan this page and find the actual rules before reading any philosophy. The mechanism list names the documents, rights, reports, and triggers that carry the deal under pressure.
Each venture shows the same order before deal economics are discussed: senior lending first, community participation below senior claims, and operator common equity at first loss.
The documents should say which decisions stay with the operator, which require consent, and which move only after a negotiated default or covenant breach.
Lender remedies, consultation rights, cash controls, and workout authority step forward only after named trigger events. They should not depend on vague concern or informal pressure.
Major debt, equity changes, asset sales, operator replacement, claim-priority changes, and mission changes belong in an explicit reserved-matter list.
Monthly financials, quarterly management updates, annual packages, and immediate material-event notices should line up with the rights each stakeholder actually has.
The stack shows who sits where, who gets paid first, who takes first loss, and which rights are economic versus control rights. Deal-specific economics can vary by venture and belong in the underlying offering and memo materials.
Senior lenders sit first in claim priority. They get covenanted reporting, defined remedies, and step-in rights only through documented triggers rather than ordinary operating votes.
Community participation sits below senior claims and above operator common in cash priority. It is economic, subordinated, and does not carry ordinary managerial control.
Operator common sits at first loss and holds ordinary control in the healthy case. That is where founder, operator, and Hadto sponsor common belong.
Ordinary control stays with the operator in the healthy case. Control changes only when the documents name the trigger, the right that moves, and the stakeholder allowed to use it.
The operator runs pricing, service quality, hiring, customer response, vendors, and ordinary operating decisions while the venture is solvent and compliant.
After a documented default, covenant breach, reporting failure, or collateral impairment, senior rights can move into consultation, cure, cash control, restructuring, or enforcement.
Community investors receive only the economic, information, consent, or voting rights granted in their documents. The community layer should not blur day-to-day operating control.
Reserved matters protect the published structure without turning every operating decision into a consent process. Reporting gives each stakeholder the information needed to use the rights they actually have.
Changes to ordinary voting control, new senior debt, material asset sales, amendments that change claim priority, and distribution policy should stay inside explicit reserved-matter rules rather than informal side deals.
The charter should show which changes require lender consent, which require class consent, and which remain with the operator in the ordinary course.
Monthly, quarterly, and annual reporting should line up with claim priority and trigger rights. Immediate notice should cover payment stress, covenant breach, litigation, operator change, control changes, and any event that could impair the published stack.
These principles do not replace the rules above. They explain why the mechanisms are written that way and where the documents should refuse ambiguity.
The operator is accountable for the business, so ordinary control should sit with the operator unless the documents name a specific reason to narrow it.
Stress-case control should be written before stress arrives. That is how lenders, operators, and junior participants know what changes after a breach.
Mission protections, sponsor conflicts, operator incentives, and class consents belong in the governing documents, not in later explanations. Mission protections should not be removable by an ordinary operating vote.
Once the mechanisms are visible, use the role pages to test what each stakeholder can do, what each stakeholder cannot do, and which service work may be needed before terms move.
The public memo and charter draft carry the longer version of this page, including venture-level economics and sample terms that should not be mistaken for final deal documents.